The first amendment ensures not that speech will be fair, but that it will be free. It cannot be both.
The courts are using the First Amendment to attack religion, when they should be using it to protect religion.
If you're not going to offend somebody you don't need the First Amendment.
As to the media, they are protected by the First Amendment, as they should be.
I'm not interested in censorship. I like the First Amendment very much.
The First Amendment is about how we govern ourselves - not about how we titillate ourselves sexually.
That's in the First Amendment?
The notion that the First Amendment has no limitations whatsoever is balderdash.
The first amendment protects free speech, but if you don't have freedom of thought, do you really have freedom of speech?
The First Amendment says keep government out of religion. It doesn't say keep religion out of government.