I believe my client. He says he didn't do anything, and he believes nobody else did anything. No matter how this turns out, it's a terrible thing for somebody.
If they gave us everything today we could start working on it.
These photos are real. We have them, and we will release them if it's appropriate. As we've said all along, this is a completely atypical way for a case to progress. We have a lot of evidence that wouldn't have come out yet, as does the state -- and we don't even have a case yet.
They had been there at some point. But we are assembling a paper trail that will show that they weren't there when this woman said the sexual assault took place. The state is going to be surprised.
I can't comment on the grand jury proceedings. I'm still confident that all the members of the team will be acquitted in the end.
Would they be swayed by seeing coverage on-air of neighborhoods up in arms and the N.C. Central campus up in arms? Does that sway them? I think they're human, and it probably would.
He's an excellent trial attorney. He's truthful. I don't get the impression he's ever taken advantage of a situation. I think he's very fair. He always gives cases thoughtful consideration, and I expect him to do the same with this.
You have to prepare from Day 1 as if you're going to war. We've been doing that, and we will continue to do that.
Go back in any news archive and look at the men who have been freed from prison, look at the men that have been taken off death row. Mistakes happen. Bad directions are taken by district attorneys; police make mistakes. It happens all the time: False accusation is commonplace.
I don't believe that the allegations that she made, multiple attacks by multiple people, would leave no signs of DNA. And there was no sign of any evidence that a male was present anywhere near that women that day.