He said what he said because he thought he was telling the government what they wanted to hear.
He said what he said because he thought he was providing the government with what they wanted to hear. The evidence will show that the government will not and cannot show any proof that he attended.
The government has shown no evidence that he actually attended; the government has failed to prove its case. Ladies and gentlemen, you can't prove what never happened.
He was coerced into saying what he said. He thought he was cooperating and truly didn't know what he was getting himself into.
There is so much more than second thoughts in that affidavit.
It was a little bit of an intimidating situation. Essentially, I walked into a small conference room with about 10 Muslim religious leaders, all men, whom I had not met before.
The government's conduct coupled with the widespread national media attention this case has received confirms that the defendants could not have a fair trial with an impartial jury anywhere in the United States.
He's saying that she couldn't see the evidence, couldn't see he was guilty.
I don't really think we necessarily need much more.
You would think the government would be able to produce direct evidence that my client attended a training camp. They cannot because that evidence does not exist.
