How can I even secretly harbour the thought that my neighbour's faith is inferior to mine?
The elephant needs a thousand times more food than the ant but that is not an indication of inequality.
The real implication of equal distribution is that each man shall have the wherewithal to supply all his natural needs and no more.
Let no one try to justify the glaring difference between the classes and the masses, the prince and the pauper, by saying that the former need more.
My idea of society is that while we are born equal, meaning that we have a right to equal opportunity, all have not the same capacity.
"All men are born equal and free" is not Nature's law in the literal sense.
If a single man demanded as much as a man with a wife and four children, then that would be a violation of the concept of economic equality.
Under ideal conditions, the barrister and the bhangi (sweeper) should both get the same payment.
No two leaves were alike, and yet there is no antagonism between them or between the branches on which they grow.
The prince and the peasant will not be equalized by cutting off the prince's head.
Economic equality is the master-key to nonviolent independence.
What is equality of rights between a giant and a dwarf?
The real meaning of economic equality is "To each according to his need."
Economic equality of my conception does not mean that every one will literally have the same amount.
Equality of sexes does not mean equality of occupations.
If non-violence is the Law of our being, the future is with Women.
If by strength is meant moral power, then woman is immeasurably man's superior
Woman in the companion of man, gifted with equal mental capacities. She has the right to participate in the minutest details in the activities of man, and she has equal right to liberty of freedom and liberty with him.
I believe in equality for everyone, except reporters and photographers.
It has always been a mystery to me how men can feel themselves honoured by the humiliation of their fellow beings.