Bruce Schneieris an American cryptographer, computer security and privacy specialist, and writer. He is the author of several books on general security topics, computer security and cryptography... (wikipedia)
It's a great, powerful browser, and I don't need to look around for an alternative,
It's a huge betrayal of the public trust, and they know it.
It's the dominant operating system out there, so it's going to attract the attention. On the other hand, Windows has extremely sloppy security,
Everyone else is just as bad. I think if you gave that same grading to corporate America, you'd see all the Fs also.
The administration is deliberately choosing a less secure technology without justification. If there were a good reason to choose that technology, then it might make sense. But there isn't.
It's certainly feasible, but it's my guess it's not economic, ... My guess is it is cheaper for the airline to absorb this loss, which doesn't happen often, than to fix the problem.
Anytime you see Microsoft doing stuff for security, it's good, it's important.
In my back pocket I have a way to break the system, but I can't publish it until I know I'm right.
I'm worried about data leakage. It's frustrating because I want to use a good desktop search program.
I'm worried about data leakage, ... It's frustrating because I want to use a good desktop search program.
I generally think the terrorists do something new each time. It is a big hole in the system.
In New Orleans, the machines just crashed, ... They didn't work. And there was no backup planned; there were no paper ballots.
But with that connection comes new threats: malicious hackers, criminals, industrial spies. These network predators regularly steal corporate assets and intellectual property, cause service breaks and system failures, sully corporate brands, and frighten customers,
I do expect it to be a huge problem.
The end result is that insecure software is common,