We're not waiting for them to contact us.
Princeton is very strong at undergraduate education in every area, whether it's firsthand research with leading minds in the world or its groundbreaking financial award program. There is no concern that if students could pick their own categories, Princeton will drop in ranking.
Princeton is attempting here to attain a leadership role, a national leadership role, in something that we have come to see as a national problem.
There's a difference between using the Princeton name based on the location, verses an intent to trade on the Princeton reputation.
It was because he had trained participants so well that they could respond so quickly, and that we could get help so quickly.
But the trial didn't proceed to a final conclusion to determine liability. We have no serious concerns over the safety of Masonry, which is one of the reasons we continue to work with them.
The university feels strongly about defending its name and we have actively and successfully challenged the use of its name in the past.
We've had several calls and inquiries this morning. The phones down there are ringing off the hook.
We know that figure is seriously inaccurate. But we will not be able to provide a precise figure until our next filing in this case, which will be on March 6.
This could cost higher education billions of dollars. There is a question on where the funds would come from.
