Many, many farmers have made significant inroads into their cost structure and we have seen a very significant surge in diversification.
Since this is a new program, we would begin with the larger accounts first. The basic theory is to provide protection for these accounts, which unfortunately can tend to disappear.
There is an endless supply of speech that seems to offend these days.
Under First Amendment jurisprudence, content-based laws are presumptively unconstitutional and can be justified only if the governmental regulation advances a compelling interest in the least restrictive means available.
My opinion of him now versus what it was a month ago is night and day.
will be remembered as the patron of some of Mercer's greatest years.
We don't expect him to separate from the university. He probably will remain in a capacity of his choosing. We just don't know what that would be yet.
There have been - what? - 26 legislatures that have passed or are about to pass laws to restrict him. And most of these laws wouldn't pass even a cursory court review.
We will change our constitution and bylaws to reflect the fact we are not associated with the convention. We're officially separate. Since we're now separate, we need to update the way we elect trustees.
We're going to be just like them, but with a bigger checkbook.
Farmers must now have highly trained financial management skills.
Then the sessions will get a little more challenging. Until then, it wouldn't be fair for us to explore what visions they would have in leading Mercer as president. They don't know Mercer very well. This first session is more of a getting-acquainted session.
I'm going to vote 'no' because I recognize the concerns of the neighborhood. I do have some residual concerns and at some point, those may be resolved.
If you look at the national numbers, we're doing very well in our economy.
This is our opportunity to build deeper relationships with our customers. We see this as a way to provide our customers with the personalized attention they need where they most need it.
The courts are obviously going to have to sort this out.
The court ruled that the law was content-based because it restricted only sexually explicit adult programming,