I don't think you can limit these school speech cases any more to the physical domains of the public school property, because in many cases it's quite possible to speak as if you were there from another location.
He was very scrupulous about anything involving the court's business. He said he is going to let history pass judgment on his role on that.
He viewed himself as a scholar of history as well as chief justice. He loved American history.
I'm sure other special prosecutors have felt frustrated, but the general norm has been that if there's no criminal conduct found, people button their lips, wrap it up and move on.
If you apply the precedents of the steel seizure case, President Bush is at the 'low ebb' of power here.
He really reveled in this kind of thing -- American history and the history of the court,