I was really shocked at how blatant they were in discussing what they did and were going to do. They knew exactly what they were doing.
But when they did that, it cut into their profitability. Doing that broke their business model, so I think this is just a last-gasp effort to put a viable face on a business that's going nowhere.
False positives are actually very common. They're particularly common for programs that aren't widely distributed, like some game.
The motive behind limiting what browser you develop for is laziness. If you develop Web applications, you must develop to the W3C standards. You do not use Microsoft's proprietary capabilities because you'll get caught in it later.
Is the Copyright Office not going to accept AOL users?
The only problem is, nobody's ever seen it, ... This is a huge trial period coming up for Microsoft.
We take a tack based on the product. We don't look at the rest of business model.
Maybe the fault of removed cookies or blocked access starts with a related third-party used by the Web publisher.
