And what we've been able to ascertain is that the bishop thought that he had hit a dog or a cat. That was his statement. However, we have additional information that shows that he didn't immediately report it to the police.
It's very critical for us to try to get into ... the state of mind of the bishop at the time of the accident, because under Arizona law we must show that he either knew, or that a reasonable person under the circumstances, should have known that he hit a person,