If the Security Council can't deal with something like the Iranian nuclear weapons program, then it's hard to imagine what circumstances the (UN) Charter contemplated the Council would be involved in.
The dismantlement of their nuclear weapons program is critical to any further movement in the talks,
Their threats show why leaving a country like that with a nuclear weapon is so dangerous.
Although Libya would need significant foreign assistance to acquire a nuclear weapon, Tripoli's nuclear infrastructure enhancement remains of concern.
We estimate that once Iraq acquires fissile material - whether from a foreign source or by securing the materials to build an indigenous fissile material capability - it could fabricate a nuclear weapon within one year.
North Korea is going to get away with keeping its nuclear weapons.
The only thing that will stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons is regime change in Tehran.
Policies intended to bring about the termination of the Iranian and (North Korean) nuclear weapons programs, which result in reducing the council's role under the (U.N.) Charter, would truly be unfortunate and ironic.
The United States believes that the long-standing, massive and covert Iranian effort to acquire sensitive nuclear capabilities makes sense only as part of a nuclear weapons program,
We are aware of the Syrian efforts to acquire dual-use technologies that could be applied to a nuclear weapons program,