She refused the extension on the grounds that the time period of eight weeks should be sufficient for Microsoft.
She took the view that a time period of eight weeks should be sufficient for Microsoft to reply to a comparatively short statement of objections.
We would have preferred obviously that Microsoft complied quickly as they indicated this time last year that they would. I would like to stress that we expect of course Microsoft to comply with the March 2004 decision and not with their own interpretation of the March 2004 decision.