When you talk about judges who would change the right of a woman to choose, who'd overturn Roe versus Wade, I think that is unlikely, ... And I have said that bluntly during the course of the campaign, that Roe versus Wade was inviolate.
Would you think that Roe might be a super-duper precedent?
It does not signify disagreement with Roe v. Wade,
Judge Roberts, in your confirmation hearing for the circuit court, your testimony read to this effect, and it's been widely quoted: Roe is the settled law of the land. Do you mean settled for you, settled only for your capacity as a circuit judge, or settled beyond that?
There's nothing in his dissent which suggests disagreement with the underlying decision of Roe V. Wade,