She will never know why Mr. Dillon did what he did.
Ricky's a good kid and a hard-nosed runner. He had those two explosive plays that really lifted us up. He's going to be a good one.
There is no greater betrayal than that of the public trust, and these defendants violated that trust.
Her prowess in the closing days was a reflection more of the public's increased confidence in her candidacy than it was any increase in time spent raising money.
The money Ms. Rice raised allowed the campaign to air more ads than our opponent in the closing days, when people are paying most attention.
That play was all Chet. He just makes everyone miss. He's a playmaker.
They obviously have a reputation. But we can't comment on any open investigations.
It's safe to say this job is on par with the volume and intensity of what she's used to, if not below it.
It's a much larger thing than just Mr. Finn.
This is in no way an attempt to usurp the judges' power. We're merely coming back to the table on sentencing.
The key is having confidence. Our motto has been to keep playing well. When you get a win it helps you get over the hump.
These are considerations that have been made clear to us already and were taken into consideration when we reduced the charge from murder to manslaughter.
The district attorney takes very seriously the violation of the public trust. And this prosecution will reflect that.