Maybe near the banyan trees. Somewhere downtown. We don't really have anything for the kids to do down there.
If they want to do this, that's fine. But I don't think it's catastrophic that it hasn't been there the whole time.
I don't know many trips you can do for a whole week for $150.
We can force them to cover the entire city, instead of cherry-picking the good parts. They often don't want to go into low-income areas.
I think it has merit and I'm not locked into it, but until somebody shows me something better, I like it.
We have traditionally had inspectors who really know a lot about the business. They seem to be getting the job done. And while we've seen some improvement in permits, we're still a long way from where we should be.
We had to consider that as part of the deal. We knew it was going to cost us more.
The ride is set up to showcase South Carolina. We're trying to show off our state.
The museum is truly an economic driver. I like the idea of having bigger and better shows there. But you've got to balance that against the value of a waterfront park system. I'm not for losing an inch of parkland.
This is a real changing of gears for the county. It just makes perfectly good common sense. It's way more affordable.
This is the first I've ever heard of it. It's true, huh? I didn't know.
Talk about Wal-Mart and you will hear from every one of them.
They look like landscaping scenes. When kids aren't on them, they look like the architecture of the park.
It's really a family-type ride. Children are welcome and people can go at their own pace.
I'm not going to pass a grand plan without the money to pay for it.
I'm really disappointed. I like the idea of voting for the person, not the party.