I think (jury consultants) are useful, but you've got to be careful.
I thought it was notable the prosecution had to impeach his own witness on the most critical point of the case.
The Patriot Act made it easier for you to identify the bank accounts.
The government's case is built around wiretaps and the testimony of proven liars and cheats.
You can lose a case before it even starts.
We'll have to wait and see what we get. If it looks like Swiss cheese, we won't be happy.
We're going to be attacking Malone from the beginning of the trial to the end of the trial.
did not do anything wrong. He was a loyal Marsh employee for 20 years and I am confident he will be found not guilty after trial.
Conflict of interest does not equal honest-services fraud.
This is a significant, significant issue in this case. It is critical that the jury is instructed that the simple accepting of a comp is not a crime.
They don't define gift. That's what she (Woodbury) said.
There isn't any evidence to support the charges against Robert Malin.
This jury has paid extraordinarily close attention to the evidence.
It's always a difficult defense when a corporate executive gets a lot of money and there isn't a sufficiently clear paper trail showing the executive was entitled to that money.
Dario has wanted to tell his story from the day he was charged.
It's always the client's decision on whether to testify. Dario has always wanted to tell people what happened, and today he had a chance to do it.
It was a glaring omission. It speaks volumes about what they think about their case.
After two months of trial, what do we have? A prosecution built around the most discredited, unreliable witnesses.
I love you, I miss you, I'm gonna hurt you.' That's what he told the Las Vegas Sun.
The evidence is clear, particularly from wiretaps, that there is a world of difference between Erin Kenny and Dario Herrera. Erin was someone whose vote was clearly for sale, which is why she pleaded guilty. Dario was someone whose vote was clearly not for sale.