Packet logs and the video together are overwhelming proof.
Someone needs to examine popular Web sites to figure out which are untrustworthy. Then users' computers need to automatically notify them before users reach untrustworthy sites.
The advertisers need to be aware that they are not getting their money's worth -- they have a contract that said they are paying for one thing and they are getting another.
The promise of the platform is that thousands of distributors would be unable to cheat 180Solutions and 180 users.
Revenue sources is the area where I am most excited about and focused on right now. How do these programs make money? Who buys these ads?
Automated analysis is probably the better way to figure out what Web sites are hostile. Robots are just staggeringly more efficient at these tasks.
That's not a compelling legal defense. The fact that you've stopped doing something is not a defense.
It's very easy to hack S3. It just takes one line of code.
That's a public relations defense, not a legal defense.